 |
PlayJazzGuitar.com Forum Jazz Guitar Discussion
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
johng83
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 99 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:49 am Post subject: Minor ii-V-i |
|
|
| Hey guys, lately I've been working on the tune Black Orpheus, and I'm having a lot of fun messing around with it- but I find that I'm doing a lot of repeating myself. I think the problem is that I don't know too many different things to play over minor ii-V-i's. I play around with harmonic minor some, but I think I end up sounding like a "high school noodler" (a term someone used recently that unfortunately seemed to apply to my use of that scale). I would like to hear some of your thoughts on what you play over a tune like this. Thanks a lot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JakeJew

Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 2192 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, don't noodle with scales on this kind of stuff, it usually sounds pretty terrible...troof! Let chord tones be your guiding force
Second of all, transcribe, transcribe, transcribe. Have you been transcribing? Just go and transcribe some minor ii V licks and you'll probably have plenty of ideas.
But here's some technical/theoretical stuff:
I'm starting to think that with approaches to chord changes I think you can usually go one of two ways - 1. make it simpler 2. make it more complicated. Both can sound pretty good
1. When you see Bm7b5 E7b9 don't think of it as two chords. The only real difference between these two chords is that the A note in the Bm7b5 resolves to a G# in the E7b9. So instead of thinking of the measure as two chords, just think of it as E7b9 with an A on the first half of the measure, and a G# on the second hafl. Technically, you'd be thinking of it as E7susb9 to E7b9. Basically just play lines off E7b9 and over the B-7b5 use an A note, over the E7b9 use a G# note.
Or, making things even simpler, you don't always have to resolve to the G#, you could really treat the whole measure as E7susb9, or Bm7b5. The F note can provide enough tension to resolve to E, the fifth of the Am7. This can actually be a pretty hip sound, it's a less obvious sound. Does this make sense?
2. Okay, making things more complicated, first of all if you want to look at scales, look at B locrian natural second (D melodic minor) and E altered scale (F melodic minor.) The neat thing about this is that anything you do over the B you can move up a minor third and poof the same lick will work for the E altered. They are parellel in this fashion. (The minor thirds thing actually works with a lot of different stuff in the context of both a major and a minor ii V)
I actually like looking at a Bm7b5 as an Fmaj7b5. Don't ask me how I got there, it's a long story, but it's my favorite sub for the m7b5. The maj7b5 is a great chord and creates a cool arpeggio. And for the E7b9 I'd think of Dm7b5 for an altered (#5) sound and one of the four available diminished seventh chords (Fdim7, G#dim7, Bdim7, and Ddim7) for a natural 5 sound. But I usually use the Dm7b5. Another sub for the Bm7b5 is Dminmaj7. You wind up getting a natural 2 over the Bm7b5, which is an interesting and um, "jazzy" kind of sound.
Keep in mind that everything is tempo relative - if you're playing the tune at a fast tempo, it will be much harder to futs around with complicated subs with each chord only getting two beats. It's better to use #1 above, simplify the measure to one entity rather than looking at it as two chords. On the other side of things, if things get slower, relative to your brain's current capacity, then you can imply more and more hip shit if you so please. That's the approach I generally take. At faster tempos, I simplify the chart in my head. At slower tempos, I might add in lots of chord substitutions to add more movement. _________________ "Inspiration may be a form of superconsciousness, or perhaps of subconciousness - I wouldn't know. But I am sure that it is the antithesis of self-consciousness." - Aaron Copland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johng83
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 99 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JakeJew wrote: | | Or, making things even simpler, you don't always have to resolve to the G#, you could really treat the whole measure as E7susb9, or Bm7b5. The F note can provide enough tension to resolve to E, the fifth of the Am7. This can actually be a pretty hip sound, it's a less obvious sound. Does this make sense? |
Yes that makes sense, I think. To be sure I understand, you are saying that instead of targeting the 3rd (G#) of the E7b9 chord, I can target the b9, which creates tension but resolves nicely because it's the 5th of the Am7?
I like your approach of treating the two chords per measure as one entity with one note different, that seems a lot easier than thinking of two chords or scales.
| JakeJew wrote: | | I actually like looking at a Bm7b5 as an Fmaj7b5. Don't ask me how I got there, it's a long story, but it's my favorite sub for the m7b5. The maj7b5 is a great chord and creates a cool arpeggio. And for the E7b9 I'd think of Dm7b5 for an altered (#5) sound and one of the four available diminished seventh chords (Fdim7, G#dim7, Bdim7, and Ddim7) for a natural 5 sound. But I usually use the Dm7b5. Another sub for the Bm7b5 is Dminmaj7. You wind up getting a natural 2 over the Bm7b5, which is an interesting and um, "jazzy" kind of sound. |
Now that is a cool sound! I have never actually played a maj7b5 arpeggio until just now, but I will be spending some time working on it. I must admit, some of these substitutions are a little beyond my current level. Since I struggle with creating logical, good sounding solos while staying within the changes, I feel I have a little more work to do before I start tackling some of these subs.
Thanks for these suggestions, they are exactly what I was hoping for when I originally made this post. I will get down to transcribing some ii-V-i licks right away! The only version of Black Orpheus I have heard is the Wayne Shorter version, though I should probably start with that. Do you have any favorite heads/solos in mind with great ii-V-i licks to transcribe/learn/steal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JakeJew

Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 2192 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
Yes that makes sense, I think. To be sure I understand, you are saying that instead of targeting the 3rd (G#) of the E7b9 chord, I can target the b9, which creates tension but resolves nicely because it's the 5th of the Am7? |
Eggzarctly!
| Quote: |
I like your approach of treating the two chords per measure as one entity with one note different, that seems a lot easier than thinking of two chords or scales. |
Cool. I believe this is the best beginning approach when looking at major ii Vs as well.
| Code: | | Since I struggle with creating logical, good sounding solos while staying within the changes, I feel I have a little more work to do before I start tackling some of these subs. :shock: |
Yes, good...take things in order, that's responsible of you. Too many people jump ahead.
| Quote: | | Do you have any favorite heads/solos in mind with great ii-V-i licks to transcribe/learn/steal? |
I think Pat Martino's "just friends", even just the first chorus or two, filled with very simple and great sounding licks that lay out easy on the guitar. Charlie Parker is probably the best place to start for transcription. Wes would be good too. Learn some Wes blues solos, those are great!
One idea that popped into my head is to just go to itunes and download versions you like of tunes you are working on...maybe stick to classic stuff (sonny rollins, parker, wes, etc) at first because that stuff is a bit easier to understand. if you are looking for minor ii vs, just find a tune that has a bunch of minor ii vs, look for a version of it...
Learn the head to "confirmation" and some of the solo. Bird treats minor ii Vs kinda like bVI to V. So Am7b5 to D7 gets treated as Eb7 to D7. _________________ "Inspiration may be a form of superconsciousness, or perhaps of subconciousness - I wouldn't know. But I am sure that it is the antithesis of self-consciousness." - Aaron Copland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johng83
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 99 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JakeJew wrote: |
| Quote: | | Do you have any favorite heads/solos in mind with great ii-V-i licks to transcribe/learn/steal? |
I think Pat Martino's "just friends", even just the first chorus or two, filled with very simple and great sounding licks that lay out easy on the guitar.
|
Great idea! El Hombre is one of the best. Very simple? I don't know about that, but at least I can figure them out by slowing it down with Transcribe!
Thanks for your help.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thomasross20

Joined: 27 Aug 2006 Posts: 139 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
majb5 arpeggio... What scale are you thinking of there? Lydian...lydian dominant (I mainly use major scale and melodic minor modes... Not too keen on harmonic minor.. Must learn diminished at some point).
I actually prefer to treat each chord individually. It means less thinking about theory and actually just applying something. I'm not too hot on subs, though.. _________________ Music is Life...AWESOME!!!
The "Assassin" trilogy by Robin Hobb. Read and enjoy.
http://www.soundclick.com/thomasross20
http://www.soundclick.com/vivify
www.myspace.com/73680701 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jazzy

Joined: 14 Dec 2004 Posts: 1660 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:45 pm Post subject: Re: Minor ii-V-i |
|
|
| johng83 wrote: | | Hey guys, lately I've been working on the tune Black Orpheus, and I'm having a lot of fun messing around with it- but I find that I'm doing a lot of repeating myself. I think the problem is that I don't know too many different things to play over minor ii-V-i's. I play around with harmonic minor some, but I think I end up sounding like a "high school noodler" (a term someone used recently that unfortunately seemed to apply to my use of that scale). I would like to hear some of your thoughts on what you play over a tune like this. Thanks a lot! |
check out this video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XN7VDjU2H4s |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bjorn
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 1035 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | thomasross20 wrote: | majb5 arpeggio... What scale are you thinking of there? Lydian...lydian dominant (I mainly use major scale and melodic minor modes... Not too keen on harmonic minor.. Must learn diminished at some point).
|
|
He is still within the Locrian Nat. 2 scale.
You see, FM7b5 = F, A, B, E. / b5, m7, 1 4 of Bm7b5.
JakeJew, you say that this is your favourite arpeggio over the m7ba chord, thats cool, some time ago it was one of mine too, but them I raised the b5 to #5 to get the 9th instead of the root.
Its a little tricky in the beginning to play with, because it isolates the chords more, so one really have to be aware of the changes in a song, but, but it sounds very good......
Later............
Bjørn. _________________ Ibanez Guitars - Classical Guitar - 7-String Classical Guitar - 6-string YAMAHA JONH PATITUCCI signature - 8 String Mandolin - 10 String Viola Caipira - Cavaquinho - Pianica & Flutes.
Groups: BW - Brazilian Group, BW - Frevo Orquestra. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thomasross20

Joined: 27 Aug 2006 Posts: 139 Location: Edinburgh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|