PlayJazzGuitar.com Forum Index PlayJazzGuitar.com Forum
Jazz Guitar Discussion
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

how do I learn Melodic Minor
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PlayJazzGuitar.com Forum Index -> The Jazz Guitar Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tombolino



Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 85
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:23 pm    Post subject: how do I learn Melodic Minor Reply with quote

Did you all learn all modes of melodic minor in as many positions as possible?

I find it very challenging for the visual patterns to stick memory wise. I am trying to learn them 3 notes per string.

I do have some "cheat" notes, example 1/2 step up works with x chord etc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jazzy



Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1560
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Learn all your scales horizontally, on one string at the time. Start from the lowest possible note in the scale. Then move on to playing intervals on two strings, three strings etc. Endless possibilities here...

Try to absorb the sound of the scale, and not just memorize some finger patterns. And also learn the functions of each note in the scale, by this I mean, what does each note do to the chord it`s played against.

Also work with all the triads in the scale, voiceleading them in different progressions. Both closed and open positions.

And as Jazzplaya mentioned in another post, write things down. I always do this.

Anyway, hope some of this helps.

Michael
_________________
www.myspace.com/michaelaadalgroup

www.myspace.com/maadal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jazz Playa



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You've got to learn all the inversions/modes of every scale. So you should be able to play the scale in all positions up and down the fretboard. it just takes memorization which means playing the scale over and over in each position until you have them memorized and can play them with your eyes closed, backwards and forwards, like Igiro said.

The good thing is that once you get them ingrained in your brain so well that its just second nature you'll begin to have freedom to express yourself all over the entire range of the instrument. The different fingerings actually tend to bring out different ideas (licks) to you and that's another reason you need to learn them all.

So not only should you transpose all the fingerings of a scale to all twelve keys you should also learn every lick that you learn within a scale fingering to all the different positions of that scale within the same key, Mastery.

Once you get them all learned its time to actually start making music with them rather than just playing scales. The trick is that no matter what scale/mode/arpeggio/substitution thereof you play against a given chord you still have to play it in a way that sounds like the chord. So if you're playing Ab melodic minor against a G7 ALT chord you want to play the line in such a way that it still sounds like G7. Listen to as much jazz as you can and hear how the great players (Coltrane, Hubbard, Byrd, Montgomery, whomever) did it, transcribe lots of their lines, and eventually you'll start to get the idea.

Yup its a journey Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JakeJew



Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 2018
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally I'm not completely confident that learning all the modes of melodic minor up and down the fretboard is a great use of time. Good to know as a reference but personally I never really play in that way...I use melodic fragments and elaborations of the harmony that I've worked out beforehand or taken from some music or solo that I've liked and transcribed. Just for me personally, understanding melodic minor harmony is essential and having all those modes down on the fretboard is certainly useful but it just seems that there would always be something somewhat better to work on - even it's just arpeggiating some of the chords that come from MM, like a m7b5 with a 9.

But that's just me...I've learned them but I seldom find myself in a situation where I'm referencing back to that scale specifically (or any mode)
_________________
"Inspiration may be a form of superconsciousness, or perhaps of subconciousness - I wouldn't know. But I am sure that it is the antithesis of self-consciousness." - Aaron Copland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jazz Playa



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Igiro very well written post, you make some excellent points every aspiring virtuoso should consider. Smile

Jake I probably shouldn't have used the word "mode" because I really don't like that word anyway. Better terms would be "usages" and "fingerings" as in learning all the usages and fingerings/positions of all the different scales. The way I see it all of the different fingerings/positions of a scale connect together to create one big soundscape in a given context anyway. I don't like being limited to playing them in one certain "box" so I learn them in every position all along the length of the neck.

Right Jake there's definitely a lot of gold in arpeggio studies as well. Scales are pretty useless without a firm grasp of arpeggios in my book so learning your arpeggios in every position is a must IMO. That concept was inherent in my earlier statement about making phrases from a scale sound like the chord your playing over. There's definitely an art to combining everything to create music.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dewey decibel



Joined: 15 Feb 2006
Posts: 1674

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

First off, I agree with Jake.

Second, is there a scale you do know in all positions? If so what is it? And how is it different than melodic minor?

Whoa, look at that- you just learned melodic minor in all positions. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JakeJew



Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 2018
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

let me preface my response by saying i'm in a little bit of a crabby mood tonight so I apologize for any inference of a negative tone in this post

Quote:
Jake I probably shouldn't have used the word "mode" because I really don't like that word anyway. Better terms would be "usages" and "fingerings" as in learning all the usages and fingerings/positions of all the different scales.


It's the same thing in my book. You're looking at a group of seven notes per octave and how to get that group memorized all over the fretboard. Whether you call it modes or fingerings or usages I think it's the same idea in the context of our discussion here.



Quote:
The way I see it all of the different fingerings/positions of a scale connect together to create one big soundscape in a given context anyway.


A "soundscape" of seven notes per octave that are simple elements of music theory. It's just the same seven notes.

Quote:

Right Jake there's definitely a lot of gold in arpeggio studies as well. Scales are pretty useless without a firm grasp of arpeggios in my book so learning your arpeggios in every position is a must IMO. That concept was inherent in my earlier statement about making phrases from a scale sound like the chord your playing over. There's definitely an art to combining everything to create music.


Arpeggios and scales are elements of music theory. I think the only use for them is, when looking at real music (rather than music theory) seeing how the music references back at these theoretical structures. Music theory comes after the music itself and too often it's though to be the other way around, imo.

So when I spoke of making good use of time, I could have expanded to say that I think what's more useful than memorizing all the MM modes everywhere on the neck is to play your favorite melodies in every position possible, and to look at how each note of a solo relates to the harmony of the tune.

The chord scale stuff is far too perscriptive and honestly I feel like the biggest leap in my playing came when I got away from scales a bit and started just playing tunes and seeing the music for what it is.

Let me demonstrate my criticism here...a good example is within altered dominant sounds. the "altered" scale has 1, b9, #9, b5/#11, b13, and b7.

That's damn specific. What if you wind up over a dominant that has a b5, b13 but a natural 9? you use a different scale? What about if you get a b9 and a natural 13? You use the fifth mode of harmonic major? What if the fifth is flat? Symmetrical diminished scale? What if you can't hear whether the fifth is flat or not...oh no, what chord scale to use?

A friend of mine showed me an altered voicing that Monk used that I believe had a 3, 11, and #11. What scale do you use over that? What arpeggio?

I think the chord scale stuff becomes bullshit at a certain point. Each note has an individual color on top of a chord, and I think an improviser is being disingenuous to play with a paint-by-numbers approach to harmony.

In jazz we have to look at the compositions - the tunes - and understand what is happening in those tunes and figure out a way to make our mark on the melody and harmony of those tunes. If I get a tune with a new chord I have to figure out the function of that chord in that tune and figure out a way to improvise over that chord in a way that is sensitive to that function. (and sometimes you do a chord where the most appropriate thing to do over it is play over a chord scale, but I think that is not the case in most standards, at least with respect to how I personally like to hear things)

I think just playing off a predetermined seven note scale is, in a sense, the easy way out.

Now, learning all the chord scales, imo, can be useful but only as a reference tool for real music, real solos, real melodies. You learn a melody and then go "oh, look, that whole thing is mostly diatonic to lydian dominant." Great, big deal, but the more relevant fact is that it's a dominant sound with a 9, #11, and 13.

Lastly I'll repeat that I think learning chord scales up and down the neck in every direction can be useful, even useful for more than what I've already specified, but the most relevant thing here is that I think the OP is at a level where he'd be much better off learning tunes, melodies, and solos rather than committing the mixo b6 scale to memory.
_________________
"Inspiration may be a form of superconsciousness, or perhaps of subconciousness - I wouldn't know. But I am sure that it is the antithesis of self-consciousness." - Aaron Copland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jazz Playa



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WOW okay.

1) sure it's the same seven notes but there are also different pitches of those notes. Playing the notes in different pitch also has a different effect. For example, that's why most players usually put the extensions or alterations of a chord in the top or in the upper registers of a chord. Putting that same alteration in the bass has a different and often undesirable effect. Although I know sometimes putting an altered tone in the bass can be very effective, its still much more common in the upper registers. Therefore I think its essential to know them all over the neck so one can take advantage of the different sonic effect of playing things in different pitches.

2) Further when you go beyond natural harmony and include melodic and harmonic harmony etc we actually have 11 tones to consider plus the octave which makes a total of 12.

3) also consider this, all computer programming is based on only zeros and one's. That's only two different numbers but once you start combining them into longer strings (like phrases in music) it makes possible everything we do with computers, from us conversing on this forum to sending rockets to outer space. Just like combining the eleven notes in music and the 12 keys in varying ways makes ever increasing levels of complexity possible.

4) As far as your analysis of improvising over altered Dominant chords goes I think your considering some things that simply aren't that important. Basically I don;t care whether the dominant chord has a an 11 and a #11 or whatever. Its basically players choice whether I use Mixolydian b6 or Locrian #2 or whatever. Even if the dominant chord is all natural I still can use all the altered those options it doesn't really matter. What matters is the phrasing and the musicianship of the player to make it work and say something musical with it. The playing field is wide open. Really the only time I care about that is when using the whole tone scale to improvise licks because of the possible clash with chords with altered 9ths in them.

Sure sometimes if a Dominant b5 appears in a chart I'll opt for Lydian b7 but if it was a 7b5#9 I might still use Lydian b7. What's more important to me is the larger context of the tune and what sounds good within that larger context. So you really need to consider what comes before it and after it in the tune and see the big picture rather then a micro focus on the specific altered tones in one chord. The whole piece of music needs to fit together as a whole.

5) I really don't like the term mode because of the kind of, in my opinion, bad way of thinking about the guitar playing that it can lead to. Also even more importantly the flawed way of teaching the guitar it can lead to that tends to veil what is really going on.

And yeah I still believe its very beneficial to know this stuff all over the fretboard and Sure I know my melodic minor arpeggios all over the neck too, and use them quite often. If you're gonna arpeggiate a scale might as well know the whole scale first right?


Last edited by Jazz Playa on Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:38 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
randalljazz



Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fwiw:

http://www.freejazzinstitute.org/showposts.php?dept=analysis&topic=20080923085713_randalljazz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sunflower



Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 572

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jazz Playa wrote:
Once you get them all learned its time to actually start making music with them rather than just playing scales.


I think this is too steep a mountain for me man

I think you should start to play music ie tunes straight away
and just pick up as much or as little of this theory as you want/need along the way
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sunflower



Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 572

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:29 pm    Post subject: Re: how do I learn Melodic Minor Reply with quote

Tombolino wrote:
Did you all learn all modes of melodic minor in as many positions as possible?

Nope
Quote:
I find it very challenging for the visual patterns to stick memory wise. I am trying to learn them 3 notes per string.

Me too , I learned so far 2 shapes only for MM and I might work on a third someday
I don't stick to the 3 notes per string thing myself
Quote:
I do have some "cheat" notes, example 1/2 step up works with x chord etc


Yeah cool , cheats are great ! on a minor ii V i in Cmin try

on Dmin7b5 ........ try F mm (mm off the 4 chord)
on G7 (alt) ........ Ab mm (maybe this is your half a step up thing ?)
on Cmin ........ C mm or whatever you want really

So on the ii V you can play a mm lick on the ii chord
then shift the same lick up a -3rd ....... its a cool sound

In a real world playing situation I don't have time for much theory
So I'm basically with Jake on this ... you can get too much theory
Its a bit like salt on food
Randalls etude looks good though thanks R
I might learn another shape for mm after all Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Volume Swell



Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 250

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To learn the melodic minor, I starting playing over a dominate chord with a lydian b7 scale. All I had to do was change one note from lydian, and I got used to the arpeggios from there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jazz Playa



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sunflower wrote:
Jazz Playa wrote:
Once you get them all learned its time to actually start making music with them rather than just playing scales.


I think this is too steep a mountain for me man

I think you should start to play music ie tunes straight away
and just pick up as much or as little of this theory as you want/need along the way


Sure start playing tunes straight away I highly recommend that. Just common sense dictates that you gotta learn a scale (probably away from the tune) before you play it in a tune. For goodness sake, how are you going to play MM in a tune if you first don't learn how to play MM?

Also I think there's some confusion here about terminology so I'll clarify. I DON'T think you need to learn a zillion ways to play the same scale, that's unnecessary, but I DO advocate learning a scale in every position along the fretboard. There's a BIG difference between those two concepts.



Igiro wrote:
1. learn the basic scale in all positions (CAGED or 3NPS or whatever you prefer) and in all 12 keys. learn it so well that you can play with eyes closed or not looking at your fretting hand.


That's EXACTLY what I've been saying from the very beginning. That's all I've been saying, learn the dog gone scale in all positions, I just tend to think of the different positions as my different fingerings of the scale NOT that you need a billion ways to play the same scale in the same position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dewey decibel



Joined: 15 Feb 2006
Posts: 1674

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll give you my experience; I learned major scales in my own version of CAGED. From there I alter those CAGED patterns to fit other scales- melodic minor, harmonic minor, etc. No, I'm not as fluent running these scales as I am with a major scale, but then again I don't usually run scales when I play. Especially when it comes to altered lines and melodic minor harmony- I know enough to play the lines I hear in my head. These are usually based more on an arpeggio than a scale.

One thing that gets me with altered lines is something that Jake brings up, things like is it a b13th or a natural 13th. I feel that a lot of subtlety gets lost because so many are taught to simply "play the melodic minor a half step up", which is the fully altered scale. Running that scale rarely sounded good to me. But running say, a min/maj7 arpeggio did. IMO, when it comes to altered harmony it's often not what you play but what you DON'T play.

I think of these things like colors. Sure red is always red and blue always blue, but when you put things next to each other, in context, red can look different. For example:

Bezold effect

The red seems lighter combined with the white, and darker combined with the black. Same about the rest of the colors when you see them on white and black. These color shades influence the way you see the other colors.




That's the same shade of red, but it looks darker with the black background. It's just like harmony, it depends on context. A b9 sounds different when paired with a b13th than a natural 13th (or no 13th at all). I don't expect everyone to agree with me here, but this is how I hear it.

My point is, don't run scales over altered chords. So there's no need to learn melodic minor all over the fret board, especially in any 3 note per string pattern. But then again my point is usually don't run scales over any chords, so...



Quote:
5) I really don't like the term mode because of the kind of, in my opinion, bad way of thinking about the guitar playing that it can lead to. Also even more importantly the flawed way of teaching the guitar it can lead to that tends to veil what is really going on.


I don't want to speak for him, but I think Jake feels the same way about the term scale.


Quote:
we've debated it before. Jake remade the point. scales are the crust, patterns are the fruit, music is the cherry and whipped cream on top. so for building "pro level" chops, its not really a matter of which one we can do without.



I'd say music is the pie. Lots of different ways to build that pie and ingredients to use, but music is the pie. I don't believe in "pro level". There's no litmus test, no bar exam to pass. Nobody cares what you can't do, just what you can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dewey decibel



Joined: 15 Feb 2006
Posts: 1674

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's cool. I don't. I mean I hold these players in high esteem of course, but not because of any technical proficiency. Wes and Grant are my favorite guitar players, and while Wes had amazing technical facility Grant is very limited. And honestly if Wes would've attended university they probably would've told him to quit using his thumb and pickup a pick.

But yes, it's a taste thing. Many different flavors out there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PlayJazzGuitar.com Forum Index -> The Jazz Guitar Forum All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group